Kendric Davis Rants MVP Snub: Was the NBL Vote Political? | Cotton Wins 96-94 (2026)

In a jaw-dropping turn of events, Sydney Kings superstar Kendric Davis has unleashed a fiery tirade on social media, accusing the NBL’s MVP voting system of being rigged against him. But here’s where it gets controversial: after losing the prestigious Andrew Gaze Award by a mere two votes to Adelaide 36ers’ Bryce Cotton, Davis claims, ‘They didn’t want me to win from the start.’** This isn’t just a story about a close race—it’s a deep dive into the politics, perceptions, and passions that fuel one of basketball’s most debated honors.

For the third consecutive season, and the sixth time in his career, Bryce Cotton secured the MVP title with 96 votes, edging out Davis’ 94. And this is the part most people miss: if just one voter had switched sides, the outcome would’ve been a tie. Both point guards led their teams to the top of the NBL ladder, with stats so close they’re practically mirror images. Cotton averaged 25.7 points per game to Davis’ 24.4, but Davis outperformed in efficiency (48% field goal percentage vs. Cotton’s 44%) and rebounds (3.9 to 3.6). Cotton, however, led in assists (7.6 to 6.7) and steals (1.8 to 1.1). So, why the outrage?

In an Instagram Live session, Davis didn’t hold back. He called out long-time NBL commentator John Casey, questioning the transparency of the voting process. ‘Let’s see who voted for who,’ Davis demanded, drawing parallels to the NBA’s open system. ‘If you put my stats against his, no names attached, and let the NBA decide, I guarantee I’d win,’ he asserted. But it wasn’t just about stats—Davis hinted at deeper biases, referencing early-season NBL posts that labeled him a ‘bad teammate.’ ‘It’s all political,’ he declared, vowing to expose what he sees as unfair treatment.

Here’s the bold question: Is the NBL MVP award truly about performance, or does popularity and politics play a bigger role than we admit? Davis’s claim that Cotton ‘won a popularity contest’ is sure to spark debate. Meanwhile, Cotton responded with a cool-headed shrug at the NBL finals press conference, joking, ‘I was too busy paying for drinks to catch all that.’

The voting system itself is straightforward—each club’s head coach and captain cast votes, with no voting for players from their own team. Kristian Doolittle (Perth Wildcats) and Nathan Sobey (South East Melbourne Phoenix) tied for third with 59 votes each. But Davis’s frustration isn’t just about losing; it’s about fairness. ‘I want it to be fair,’ he told The Daily Telegraph, leaving fans and critics alike wondering: Is the system broken, or is Davis simply a sore loser?

As the Kings prepare to face the winner of the play-in games next month, and Cotton’s 36ers gear up for their own semifinal showdown, one thing’s clear: this MVP drama isn’t fading anytime soon. What do you think? Was Davis robbed, or is he overreacting? Let’s hear your take in the comments!

Kendric Davis Rants MVP Snub: Was the NBL Vote Political? | Cotton Wins 96-94 (2026)
Top Articles
Latest Posts
Recommended Articles
Article information

Author: Jamar Nader

Last Updated:

Views: 5987

Rating: 4.4 / 5 (55 voted)

Reviews: 94% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Jamar Nader

Birthday: 1995-02-28

Address: Apt. 536 6162 Reichel Greens, Port Zackaryside, CT 22682-9804

Phone: +9958384818317

Job: IT Representative

Hobby: Scrapbooking, Hiking, Hunting, Kite flying, Blacksmithing, Video gaming, Foraging

Introduction: My name is Jamar Nader, I am a fine, shiny, colorful, bright, nice, perfect, curious person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.